Post by messi05 on Jan 24, 2024 4:41:28 GMT
The organizer of a contest and the winner of the contest have a consumer relationship. This happens because, in addition to the vulnerability of competitors in relation to those who promote the competition, those who organize have indirect gains by exploiting the images of the winners. Reproduction/TV Globo Institute created by presenter did not give the ticket to the winner of the competition, carried out in conjunction with another company. Reproduction/TV Globo This was the understanding of the 22nd Chamber of Private Law of the Court of Justice of São Paulo when condemning Instituto Criar de TV e Cinema, which was created by Luciano Huck, and Brax Brazilian Experience for not giving a prize to the winner of a contest.
The competition, which took place in 2013, offered a scholarship in the United States as a prize. The Buy Phone Number List author of the action did not have the documents required to enter the country when he was declared the winner of the competition and only managed to obtain them a few days before the trip. This delay in obtaining the documentation was the defendants' justification for not providing the trip in 2013. The following year, the argument presented for not paying for the winner's trip to the USA was the absence of competition that year due to the World Cup in Brazil. In the sentence, the defendants were ordered to pay R$5,000 as compensation for moral damages and R$28,600 as compensation for material damages.
In their appeal to the TJ-SP, both claimed illegitimacy to appear at the center of the action. Instituto Criar stated that it only helped organize the competition. Brax Brazilian Experience claimed that it did not buy the tickets for fear that the author of the action would not be admitted by the US authorities. “With all due respect, days before the trip the author presented the visa, with no evidence in the file that there was a schedule for presenting documents, as clearly highlighted in r. appealed sentence”, highlighted the case rapporteur, judge Roberto Mac Cracken. According to the judge, there is no doubt about the defendants' illegal conduct. He also highlighted that the consumer relationship in this case is clear.
The competition, which took place in 2013, offered a scholarship in the United States as a prize. The Buy Phone Number List author of the action did not have the documents required to enter the country when he was declared the winner of the competition and only managed to obtain them a few days before the trip. This delay in obtaining the documentation was the defendants' justification for not providing the trip in 2013. The following year, the argument presented for not paying for the winner's trip to the USA was the absence of competition that year due to the World Cup in Brazil. In the sentence, the defendants were ordered to pay R$5,000 as compensation for moral damages and R$28,600 as compensation for material damages.
In their appeal to the TJ-SP, both claimed illegitimacy to appear at the center of the action. Instituto Criar stated that it only helped organize the competition. Brax Brazilian Experience claimed that it did not buy the tickets for fear that the author of the action would not be admitted by the US authorities. “With all due respect, days before the trip the author presented the visa, with no evidence in the file that there was a schedule for presenting documents, as clearly highlighted in r. appealed sentence”, highlighted the case rapporteur, judge Roberto Mac Cracken. According to the judge, there is no doubt about the defendants' illegal conduct. He also highlighted that the consumer relationship in this case is clear.